Heavenly Father,
Sunday, June 25, 2023
Prayer: Hospitality (Luke 10:25-37)
Sunday, November 06, 2022
Sermon: Seeing People Differently (Philemon)
(Preached at Waitara Gospel Chapel on 6/11/2022)
When I was asked to preach here on Philemon today, I was excited to say yes. Partly that's because I haven't been to Waitara Gospel Chapel for a while, and it's lovely to catch up with you all. I can sincerely echo Paul's sentiments to Philemon as a supporter of his ministry and say, "Your love has given me great joy and encouragement, because you, brothers and sisters, have refreshed the hearts of the Lord’s people."
And just as Paul did in his letter to Philemon, I also pray "that
your partnership with us in the faith may be effective in deepening your
understanding of every good thing we share for the sake of Christ." As I
tell stories about my ministry with SIM in Namibia, and my ministry here in
Australia with Horizons Family Law Centre, I hope that the partnership you as a
church have with me and Horizons deepens your understanding of every good thing
we share for the sake of Christ.
I'm also
excited to preach because in the little letter of Philemon, Paul writes to a
fellow Christian about one of his slaves. And I am very passionate on the topic
of slavery. At the end of 2019 I accepted a position with For Freedom -
SIM's ministry division focused on combatting human trafficking, the trade in
modern day slaves. The idea was for me to serve in SIM's anti-human trafficking
work in Namibia and southern Africa.
Human
trafficking is a big problem in Namibia. Let me try and give an example of how
bad. Between 2011 and 2017 Australia had 31 prosecutions for human trafficking.
Namibia also had 31 prosecutions for human trafficking during that same period.
But Australia's population is 10 times bigger than Namibia. Why is it ten times
worse in Namibia? Well, Namibia has higher levels of poverty and
desperation. Australia has a highly functioning law enforcement system! Namibia
didn't even have proper anti-human trafficking legislation until
2018.
But
another problem Namibia has is a culture that is more accepting of some forms
of trafficking. Let me give you an example. I worked with a lady, Sarah, who started
a church based anti-trafficking ministry in Namibia. Sarah was visiting a
Herero village to teach the people there about human trafficking. There's no
word for "human trafficking" in Otjiherero, so Sarah had to explain
that we're talking about using fraud, force, coercion or abuse of power to to
exploit a vulnerable person.
Now a
woman in that village had a boy looking after her livestock. He was scruffy,
thin, poorly clothed, didn't go to school. She said that this boy's parents had
died, and he had no other family. She fed him. But she didn't send him to
school or look after him like one of her own children. This boy was not
adopted. Instead, she sent him off after her livestock to shepherd them, take
them water, find them grazing land. But she didn't pay him like a hired farm
worker.
This boy
was a slave. He wasn't chained up. He was "free" to leave anytime he
wanted. But he had nowhere to go. He was vulnerable, and she was exploiting his
vunerability through coercion and abuse of power. And that's human trafficking.
It's not the kind of sophisticated modern slavery undertaken by organised crime
syndicates across the world, but it's still slavery.
The woman
was not happy to be told this. She said, "If I didn't do this, the boy
would starve and die." This argument made what she was doing acceptable to
everyone in her village, and would have been agreed to in many villages. This
scenario plays out again and again across Namibia. 20 years ago 1 in 3 Namibian
adults had HIV - today that number is about 1 in 10; so there are lots of
orphaned kids. Looking after orphans is great. But exploiting their
vulnerability for your personal gain is not okay. Her response to this was,
"Well, if you think what I am doing is wrong, you adopt him. You feed him,
you send him to school." If she couldn't exploit this boy, she didn't want
anything to do with him.
How would
you get this woman to treat her boy slave differently? Maybe you'd call the
police. But the police might not do anything - even in Australia, many
identified cases of human trafficking aren't dealt with by police. Plus calling
the cops pretty much ruins your relationship with the whole village -
you'll never do ministry there again. This wasn't Sarah's home village,
but it was part of her clan group, so burning her relationship with them was
not ideal.
Would you
talk to the woman's church pastor or her tribal chief and get them to force her
to look after the boy? That might work, but do you think the woman's
relationship with the boy would really improve if she was feeling
resentment about being forced to care for him?
Would you
adopt the boy? Sarah was a single woman living very simply in the settlements
in Windhoek. It would have been hard, but she probably could have sought
another care arrangement for the boy. But does that really solve the problem
for the woman who enslaved him, or the village who condoned it?
Maybe
you're simply thankful you don't have to deal with this problem. We don't have
this kind of problem here in Australia. So this just isn't relevant - and
neither, you may think, is Paul's letter to Philemon. Not because we
don't have slaves in Australia - last year it was estimated there are around
15,000 modern day slaves in Australia. But we don't have the kind of culture
Namibia has where even one kind of slavery is acceptable. You'd never have to
try to convince someone to free a slave in Australia. So why bother thinking
about it?
But we
know that God speaks to us through the scriptures, so we can trust that there
is something true and something valuable for us in this letter. And in my
reflections on Philemon, I've certainly seen truth and value relating to
my own life and our work at Horizons Family Law Centre.
So let's
take a look at what was happening when Paul wrote this letter. Paul is in
prison. He's writing to Philemon and his family, a wealthy family who seem
to be important members of the church in Collosae. We know they're wealthy
because Paul is writing to them about Onesimus. Onesimus is Philemon's
slave. That much is obvious, because he's got what at the time was a slave
name. Onesimus literally means "useful".
Onesimus
has run away. Philemon may have mistreated him; Onesimus may have stolen from
his master. Certainly Paul is concerned, because the punishment for a slave
fleeing their master can be anything up to and including death, and Paul
doesn't want Philemon to exact such a harsh punishment.
Onesimus
somehow found his way to Paul. He heard the gospel, became a Christian, and
served Paul's needs so well that Paul describes Onesimus as a son; just like he
says about Timothy. And now, despite how useful Onesimus has become to Paul and
to the gospel, Paul wants to send him back to his master, Philemon. Because
Paul sees that there's a relationship here that's in trouble, and he wants to
help both of these Christian brothers reconcile. And he thinks the best way to
resolve this tension is for Onesimus to return to Philemon, for Philemon to
free Onesimus from slavery and accept him as a brother in Christ, and then to
send Onesimus back to Paul to serve him and the gospel once again.
Now Paul
could have solved this very directly. He says in verse 8 "in Christ
I could be bold and order you to do what you ought to do". This is
Paul the apostle to the gentiles we're talking about here. He could just throw
his weight around and order Philemon to free his slave.
And
imagine if he had done that. Imagine if the letter to Philemon we had in
scripture had a spirited, powerful rebuke of Christians who owned slaves,
banning Christians from participating in slavery and clearly stating how
sinful it is. Imagine how different the world might look!
The
latest global estimates say that in today's world there are over 50 million
people living in modern day slavery. 50 million men, women and children, found
in every single country of the world, being trafficked as though they were just
another commodity - cheap labour, sex objects, mail-order brides, even a source
of organs for transplant. In the world's history, there has never been more
humans living in slavery than there are today.
And yet
although there are more people in slavery today than ever before, they
represent the smallest percentage of the world's population that has been in
slavery than ever before in recorded history. Today it's thought about one in
every 200 people are modern slaves. Back in Jesus' time, it's estimated that up
to 25 percent of the population of the Roman empire were slaves. One in four!
The impact of slavery in the ancient world was huge.
But if
Paul had simply penned the words "I do not permit a Christian to own a
slave", centuries of misery may have been avoided. The ascension of the
church into Europe's dominant religion could have been followed by a downturn
in slavery. Black slavery in America may never have arisen. Apartheid in
southern Africa may never have happened. Or even if those things still happened
- the evil of the human heart is deep - I think it's reasonable to say that a
clear statement against slavery as sinful by Paul in the New Testament could
have reduced a lot of suffering for a lot of people.
Did Paul
know that he held that power in his pen? Did he know he was writing scripture
that would last thousands of years? I don't know. But I do that the Holy Spirit
inspired Paul's words. God could have worked in Paul's heart to be more
forthright to Philemon in his letter. But that's not the message we read here.
Instead, it seems that even though God leads Paul to care about Onesimus's
welfare, he also leads Paul to care about Philemon's heart attitude, and about
the ongoing relationship between a slave and his master.
God is
not in the business of blind enforced obedience. So Paul doesn't order Philemon
to free his slave Onesimus, even though he could. Instead, he appeals to
Philemon on the basis of love. God cares about people's hearts, not just their
actions. God wants us to have a relationship with him, to do the right thing
because we love him. He wants us to act because we love one another, because we
love our neighbour, because we love the weak, because we love our enemies.
As I've
said, we don't live in a country where there is a cultural acceptance of
slavery. But there are many other actions and attitudes that are culturally
acceptable in Australia but are not in line with loving God and loving our
neighbour. In our work with families in crisis at Horizons, we see an
understandable but unfortunate attitude between many parents who are in
conflict. In our most recent newsletter you can read about one of our clients,
who we'll call Alan. He and his ex-partner had a messy break-up, and because
she felt hurt, she stopped their children from seeing their dad for months.
When he first came to us, Alan wanted to take his ex-partner to court, to force
her to let the kids spend time with him again. Court is a slow, expensive and
painful process for everyone, but Alan didn't care. He was already feeling
hurt.
Alan
could have gone to court and got the court to force their mum to let the kids
spend time with him. His kids should grow up knowing their dad. But there's an
old saying: "Those convinced against their will are of the same opinion
still." Even if Alan went to court and even if he convinced the court to
make orders forcing the other parent to let the kids see him, she would still
be of the same opinion about him. She would resent him. She might resent having
to do something she didn't want to do. Even if she never said it, her kids
might grow up knowing that their mum hated their dad, and that can sour a
child's relationship with their parent forever.
Thankfully,
our lawyer, Jono, encouraged Alan to give mediation a real crack. Mediation is
a compulsory step before court, but so many people just see it as a speed bump,
an obstacle to overcome before getting to court and forcing the other parent to
do what they want. But the truth is for parents who are able to put their
conflict aside and seek to come to an agreement about what's best for their
kids, the results are faster, cheaper, less painful, and most importantly more
likely to succeed.
Mediation
works because when two people come to an agreement about the way to move
forward, it's not just their actions that change, but their heart attitude
changes too. Why break the terms of a plan that you helped make, that you
agreed to? Alan's kids are still young, and these two will continue to be their
parents their whole lives. Because Alan was able to show how he had changed for
the better, and convince his ex-partner that he really did love their kids and
want what was best for them, because he was prepared to make concessions, she
was also able to make an agreement, and their agreement is very likely to work.
Now it's
true that such agreements are not always capable of being reached. It's true
that sometimes people feel pressured into making agreements they don't really
agree with. It's true that sometimes people must be forced to do what is in the
best interests of a child's welfare or safety, or more broadly force needs to
be used to protect people or society from harm. That's why we have police. But
the message we're seeing here in Philemon is that God doesn't want us to
escalate straight to force if we can avoid it. We should avoid going straight
to the logical conclusion of, "Well, I'm in the right and I've got the
power here, so why bother talking about it when I can just force them in the
end anyway?"
There are
a lot of things in Australian culture that we in the church might not agree with,
and yet that we might see seeping into the lives of those around us. How should
we deal with one another in such situations? I would hope we could find the
grace and love that Paul finds in his letter to Philemon. We need to remember
that God wants us to focus not just on doing what's right, but wanting to do
what's right out of love.
How might
we help someone to not just change their actions, but their heart attitude?
Here's a few things I think we see in Paul's approach to Philemon, which guide
us in our interactions with our clients at Horizons.
First of
all, Paul's approach is made in the context of relationship. Paul starts the
letter acknowledging Philemon's love and faith, and the partnership they have
in the work of the gospel. And even though Paul doesn't leverage his authority
as an apostle against Philemon, he still mentions it in terms of reminding
Philemon of how close they are: in verse 19 he says that Philemon owes him his
very self, which I think is a reference to Paul being the one who led Philemon
to faith. Paul is able to have this conversation with Philemon because they
share a close relationship of faith.
In our
work at Horizons, we accomplish this by listening to our clients, understanding
how hard and painful their situation is, and showing them not only that we can
help, but that we actually care.
And it's
not always easy to find that level of understanding. I don't have kids that I
haven't seen for months. I don't have a marriage marked by conflict and hurt. I
don't have a substance abuse problem, or a string of run-ins with the police.
But that's not really what understanding is about. The understanding Paul
shows us here is being able to see people differently.
Paul
doesn't see Philemon just as a slave master who has treated a slave so harshly
they have risked death to flee. He sees a Christian church leader who he led to
faith and who wants to serve God more. And so as Paul talks with Philemon, he
seeks to help Philemon see his slave as something more as well: as a fellow man
in verse 16, as a brother in Christ (vs 15 you might have him back
forever— no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a dear brother),
as a beloved son of Paul (vs 10 Onesimus, who became my son
while I was in chains), even as an apostle himself (vs 17 welcome him as you
would welcome me.).
At
Horizons, we seek to help clients like Alan see themselves not as an aggrieved
husband, but rather as a loving father; to see their ex-partner not as an
enemy, but rather a co-worker; and to see their children not as pawns in a
battle of passions, or symbols of injustice, or reminders of past pain, but as
kids in need of love and care.
This is
the gospel: that God transforms people into who they are meant to be, into
their best selves. The closer we get to Jesus, the more he changes us to be
like him.
Look at
Paul in this letter: he denies himself the title of apostle in dealing with
Philemon, eschews giving orders, and instead takes the name "a
prisoner of Christ Jesus", to help a slave by seeking to free him, but
also to help this slave master by encouraging his escaped slave to return to
him, and encouraging the master to show him mercy by not punishing him and by
actually freeing him out of love for Christ.
Paul is
holding out change to Philemon as an offer, as a different way, a better way, a
Christ-like way. He is offering Philemon the chance to transform from being
Onesimus's master to becoming his brother in Christ.
We held
out to Alan the chance to be more like Jesus by offering him the chance to
transform from being a sometimes difficult, sometimes despondent man seeking
conflict in a courtroom, into the loving father who recognises his ex partner
as a loving mother and who works for what's best for his kids.
Sometimes
it looks different. My client, we can call her Amanda, had separated from
her partner, and now her ex partner wants to see their kids. The problem is he
has a chronic addiction to hard drugs. I was able to come alongside Amanda
and encourage her - literally help her find the courage - to say no to her
ex-partner until he's been able to transform his life into one that is safe and
beneficial for his kids to be with him. We offered Amanda the chance to
transform into someone who is courageous enough to stand up for her kids' safety,
and in doing so even offer her ex-partner the chance to transform into a better
father and a healthier person free from drugs. Will he take up that
chance? I don't know. But in helping Amanda see that she has a choice, and that
her ex has a choice, an opportunity to change, we hold out a message
of hope.
Truth is
we can't change the world. We can't even change people. But thankfully, we
don't have to. Thanks to Jesus making the path to God clear for us, and thanks
to the Holy Spirit working in each of us, the message of hope that we can be
transformed is available to anyone. That's our focus at Horizons: to help
families in crisis remake themselves. We hold out the offer of hope that people
can change. You don't need to be a solicitor to do that. You don't need to be
an apostle. You can be a struggling single mum holding out that
hope to your drug addicted ex-partner.
But there
is a cost. This hope, this change, requires sacrifice. That cost was
borne first and foremost by Jesus on the cross. But following this path of
hope, seeing ourselves and others differently, seeking to reconcile
relationships, offering people the chance to be closer to the loving person
Jesus wants them to be rather than simply forcing them to do what's right, that
bears its own cost. Philemon is being asked to bear a big cost - to free a
slave who wronged him, to give up not just the financial investment of a slave,
but the right he has to punish that slave for wrongdoing. And that's a big ask.
If he
decides not to change, not to pay that cost, then it costs Onesimus - he
gets sent back to his master with no guarantee that Philemon will release him,
no guarantee that his master won't have him killed! And that's why Paul
actually holds himself out to pay the cost on Onesimus’s behalf, saying in
verse 18 "If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to
me." In the same way Christ intercedes for us, so Paul intercedes between
the slave and his master.
We need
to recognise that cost when we are holding out this offer of transformation to
others. When clients come to us, it's because they are wanting there to be
change for their families, but they can't afford to pay the cost: they can't
afford a family lawyer to help them navigate the system. But if their family
situation doesn't change, someone else pays the price. Quite often it's their
kids. So like Paul, we seek to stand between them, offering our services for
free or at low cost, so that these families in crisis have the opportunity to
remake themselves.
Did
Philemon end up freeing Onesimus? The letter doesn't tell us, but church
tradition says that he did; that Onesimus did return to serve Paul in prison,
and he actually ended up becoming the bishop of the church of Ephesus after
Timothy, before being martyred by the emperor.
And did
Paul's letter have a bigger impact on slavery? Yes! Today, we'd consider
slavery a serious sin. The reason slavery isn't a way of life now for one
quarter of the population is in no small part because of a short
letter Paul wrote to one of his converts about a slave, and then the ongoing
sacrifice of people to change their own ways, and then seek to help others
change. Did it happen as quickly as we'd like? No. But is it clear evidence of
God transforming people to loving one another enough not to countenance
enslaving each other? You bet.
Does our
work at Horizons change the world? No. But through it God changes people to
make good decisions for their families, rather than simply being forced to do
something they don't value or understand. Many of our clients make real
sacrifices to follow God's call to love our enemies and love our neighbours.
Like
Paul, at Horizons we're called to make a sacrifice, to stand in the gap and
hold out hope to families who really need it. No doubt you can imagine that a
bunch of Christian lawyers like us could go into the marketplace and earn
substantially more instead of living by faith. I recently took on another day a
week at Horizons, and that has a real cost. And just like Paul, we are only
able to stand in that gap with the support of churches and Christians like you.
Christians like Philemon who were not forced to help but who heard the request
to look at others differently and responded generously. So let me thank you for
your refreshing of us in this ministry, and invite you to share with us
in holding out the hope of transformation to others.
Saturday, June 04, 2022
Prayer: Pentecost 2022
Heavenly Father,
Saturday, May 28, 2022
Sermon: Freedom to Serve (1 Corinthians 9:19-23)
1 Cor 9:19-23 = Freedom to serve
A few
weeks ago while we were away in Namibia I loaned our car to someone from
Ministry of Game. He'd had a car accident just before we left, and needed a car
to get to work. When we got back and he returned the car, he told me that one
of the headlights had blown. And I thought, "That's okay. I've changed a
headlight before. I'll fix that when I have some free time."
A couple
of weeks passed, and I was driving along one night and noticed that the
headlight was still out. "I really need to get around to that," I
thought. "As soon as I have some free time."
A blown
headlamp is not a hugely difficult job to replace, and it's important, not only
to make sure my car is legally roadworthy, but also as a safety issue. So why did
it take me so long to find the time to fix it? Because life is busy! Other
things pop up. Penny came down with covid. I started back at work. I returned
to Ministry of Game. I was asked to preach a sermon. I had the ability to
fix the headlamp, but just couldn't find the time.
But it
just so happens that during this same period with the broken headlamp I also
had a lot of free time. I had pretty bad jetlag for about two weeks. I would
regularly wake up at 2.00, 3.00, 4.00am and I would sit around twiddling my
thumbs.
Why
didn't I go and fix the headlamp then? Because you can't get a new headlamp at
3am! The petrol stations around my area don't seem to stock them. I could get a
coffee or a donut or petrol, but I couldn't get a headlamp. I had the time to
fix it, but not the capacity. Anyone who has had long-term insomnia knows this
feeling of having lots of time but few ways of redeeming it because of the
circumstances.
It's
interesting how two totally opposite life situations - high capacity low time,
and high time low capacity - both end up with the same result: some important
things don't get done.
And I
think often we feel like it's important work for God that falls through these
cracks. We see opportunities to serve the gospel, but either we're too busy to
make use of them, or our capacity means we're unable to do them.
Then we
read a message like the one Paul writes to the Corinthian church in 1
Corinthians 9:19-23 where he claims that for the sake of the gospel he has
become all things to all people so that by all possible means he might save
some. He made himself a slave to everyone, he says, to win as many as possible.
And sometimes we get tempted to just switch off and say, "That sounds
really hard. I'm no Paul. I can't even find time to change a headlamp. I can't
even sleep. It's just going to make me feel bad thinking about it. This passage
isn't for me. I just can't do that."
Now the
thing is there is a challenge to us in this passage, but let me tell you it's
not one that should leave us feeling like that! Paul isn't talking about his
life in order to make us feel bad, or to try and big note himself. And he's not
saying that every Christian's life needs to follow the same exact pattern that
his did. We don't all need to be church planters, pastors, evangelists,
missionaries, preachers, writers of scripture. Earlier in Corinthians he says
that he thinks it would be great if we all stayed single, but he knows even
that isn't realistic, and isn't God's plan! We don't have to live the same life
as Paul, perform the same actions as Paul. God's plan is big enough for all
people to play their part: Jew or gentile, rich or poor, young or old, single
or married, male or female, slave or free.
Paul is
talking about his life because he really was devoted to the gospel, and that
devotion is clear in how he has lived his life, and he's saying that makes
him someone worth listening to about how we all should live if we want to be
devoted to the gospel. This whole chapter has basically been about Paul's resumé
of why the Corinthian church should listen to him when he answers them about
how they should use their freedom in life.
In our
specific section he's addressing the freedom God has given him to choose what
he does with his life, what choices he makes about what he does with his time,
and who should get the benefit of his efforts. He's really clear about it: he
is prepared to give up "his" way of doing things - the way of
life that might make him more comfortable or more at ease or fit better in with
his peers - in order to provide more opportunities for the gospel to be
heard and accepted by other people. He becomes what people need to be able to
give the gospel a fair hearing. He does it for the sake of the gospel.
We have
that same freedom. Just like Paul, God has given us the freedom to choose what
we do in our lives. And I don't mean that vacuously, like when we say to kids,
"You can be anything you want when you grow up; you could be Chief Justice
of the High Court if you work hard!" Only 13 people have ever held that
position in Australia's history; no doubt there have been lots of people who
worked very hard in their lives and yet were disappointed - the chances of
getting there are perishingly small. We're not God; we don't get to determine how
everything happens.
But God
is God, and he could determine everything for us. Like windup robots, all our
moves could be predetermined so that we have no say. But amazingly, graciously,
he allows us to make choices about our lives - sometimes bigger choices, and
sometimes smaller ones. Sometimes we have the freedom to make changes to our
lives, and other times we can find ourselves trapped in our circumstances and
our only choice is how we deal with it. Paul is saying when he has choices to
make, he asks the question "How will this further the gospel?" and
whatever the answer is, that's how he makes his decision.
And that
way of treating choices has two results. First of all, it directly furthers the
gospel! It means that all the choices we make are serving the gospel. And
secondly, by making choices in our life that further the gospel instead of just
whatever society wants, or what makes us the most money or the most happy or
the most comfortable, the gospel becomes that much more credible to others
because it's clear we take it seriously. We see this worked out in our passage
today: Paul chooses to live his life in a way that helps Jews, gentiles, and
even the weak in faith be won over by the gospel; and then he says to the
Corinthians, "and because I live my life this way, I'm worth listening to
about this".
But what
about the busyness of life? Life has gotten busier for a lot of people. Kids
have more structured sports, activities and club memberships, which means their
parents have more time driving them around and attending them. Older kids
are more likely to have jobs. Most university students also hold down jobs at
the same time as they study full-time, and many young adults in the workforce
will find they need to continue upskilling with more study once they enter
their career. Housing prices and cost of living continues to increase, along
with a felt need for more stuff, and so the amount of time spent at work
increases. With many families having both parents working, grandparents spend
more time looking after grandkids.
Or what
about my incapacities? This modern life also leaves people tired and depleted and
lonely. People see friends and family less often - especially true in covid
times, but even before that it was hard, because people had less time. People
are lonelier than ever before. Just a really simple example: you don't talk to
strangers on public transport or in public places or shops anymore. It's been a
gradual thing over time, but when we lived in Namibia I noticed a marked
difference in how open and affable complete strangers were.
We can
get really tied up in looking at what we aren't doing, and especially looking
at certain activities that we see as really central to the service of the
gospel - preaching, evangelistic programs, discipleship programs, mission work,
volunteering on the church rosters - and the less we are doing of them, the
less we think we're devoted to the service of the gospel. And so then we feel
like we're failing God, because we're not living up to the example of Paul.
A couple
of weeks ago I was having a chat with a young adult Christian man who works as
a professional, and he was asking this question: why aren't more Christians
reducing their workload, freeing up time, so they can spend more time doing
work with the church and in activities that further the gospel?
And I
said to him, Brother, since becoming a Christian I have tried to live
a life dedicated to the gospel! Attending, hosting and running bible
studies, preaching in churches around Australia, choosing my university studies
based on how I thought I could serve the gospel, my first job out of uni was
with a mission agency, then working for a charity for persecuted
Christians, attending bible college, becoming a church elder, running
youth groups and youth camps, founded and run Ministry of Game, taking part
time jobs and pay cuts so that I have enough free time to devote to church
ministries, donating a portion of my income, and even putting my profession on
hold to go overseas as a missionary. I have chosen paths less travelled so that
my opportunities for serving the gospel were higher, even if it meant other
opportunities suffered. And I can tell you that now that I'm in my 40s, those
sacrifices of time and reduced income and less professional development are
taking their toll. Would I do it again? Probably. But I can tell you I can
totally understand why some people would not, or could not, make those same
sacrifices.
And I can
still read what Paul says about his life and feel inadequate, because there
have been opportunities that I have let pass by because I simply didn't have
the wherewithal to take them on. There were needs I saw in Namibia that I
desperately wished I could attend to, but even if I had the time, I didn't know
where to begin. It's like when you see someone broken down on the side of the
road with their car bonnet up and smoke pouring from the engine. I could stop
and ask if they need help, but I can't fix the engine - I'm not a mechanic!
That's just the way life is: even if you're choosing between serving the gospel
by going left or serving the gospel by going right, when you choose one you
can't do the other. You lose that opportunity at that time. None of us can do
everything.
But the
really great thing about Paul's focus on the choices we make is that those
problems of having lots of opportunities but no time to act on them, or lots of
time but no opportunities to act on, become less important. Now, obviously
there are choices we can make in our lives that will free up our time and
energies to be involved in those important ministries that serve the gospel, as
I like to think I've done in my life. But just like Paul says he wishes
everyone stayed single so they had more freedom to serve God the way he does,
but that's simply not for everyone: we can't judge one another, and we can't
judge ourselves, simply for not making those choices.
But you
know what is for everyone? Making sure that the choices you do make are ones
that you can see allow you to serve the gospel, because not only will this
ensure that you are serving the gospel in everything you do, but it will also
mean that the way you have consciously decided to live your life will be
gospel-shaped, and that will give authenticity and genuineness to the gospel
you share with others, because both your words and your deeds back it up. While
the gospel message is always worth hearing, the gospel you share will be worth
hearing from you.
And those
choices about your life come in big and small sizes. Remember my headlamp?
Pretty small thing. But the choice to fix it serves the gospel; leaving it
broken does not. It's illegal and unsafe to drive around with a broken headlamp
- and what will others think about the genuineness of my faith in Jesus if I
won't take the time to fix such a small thing? I can tell you the moment I
realised this might be a good illustration for my sermon, I went out and fixed
the headlamp!
An
example of a big decision might be what you're going to do with your life for
the next few years. Since coming back from Namibia, I've had lots of people
tell me, "I could never be a missionary in Africa." And many of them
came up with really good reasons why! I honestly wasn't expecting that. I
thought, "If someone like me could do it, surely anyone could." But
just like marriage is not for everyone, neither is overseas mission. And of
course I'm not dismissing the strength that God provides us to accomplish great
things in his name - he has shown again and again that he can do such great
things with weak people. And I'm not discounting the call of God on some
people's lives - if you hear it, you'll know, and you need to listen. But
at that point it's a different kind of choice, because if you feel convicted by
God to do something and you don't do it, that is sin. We shouldn't be choosing
to sin.
But a lot
of the time, the big choices we get to make about how we are going to shape our
lives are choosing between two good things. The gospel can use accountants and
police officers. It can use prayers and payers and pastors and parents. It
can use the married and the single. Some of these big choices you can't make
lightly: buying a house is a long-term commitment, but you can sell it;
changing careers is a pain but you can do it; it's much more difficult to
change marriage partners or having children.
Whatever
choice you're making, when you're choosing between things, you need to look at
them for yourself and weigh up for yourself how you see it allowing you to
serve the gospel, because even though you might be choosing between two good
alternatives in principle, in practice one might not be so good for you in your
service to the gospel. While doctors might be super useful to the gospel,
you as a doctor might not be. I don't know why it wouldn't work for you in
particular: maybe you'd be too distracted by the big salary, or you would have
a bad bedside manner, or you'd get too frustrated by the years of study and you
want to do something to help people right now! That's one of the reasons
I love Ministry of Game. It's a ministry that involves doing something I
already love doing - playing games with people - and turns that thing into
something I can do to serve the gospel by sharing my life with these people and
contributing to their journey along the Waitara Path.
Not
everything is going to be like that, sure - packing up chairs or cleaning up
after cooking aren't my most favourite things, but I can see how they serve the
gospel and so I choose to do them rather than not do them. And sometimes you
have to choose to not do something now so you can do something later: I could
volunteer every waking moment of my time to gospel ministry and I would pass
out after about 72 hours I reckon, because I need sleep, I need to eat and
drink, I need rest. This follows the emergency mask principle on the airplane.
When they say in the safety instructions "Put on your own mask before helping
others", that's because starving yourself of oxygen is not going to help
you help more people. It's going to leave you unconscious on the floor needing
someone else's help. So even choosing rest can be a choice for service of the
gospel. You know I was more disappointed than I thought I'd be when I heard the
church wasn't going to be a polling place for this election? I won't get to use
my sausage flipping skills to serve the gospel. But rather than focus on the
choice I didn't have, I needed to focus on the choice I did have: what was I
going to do with my election day if not volunteer at church? And I ended up
deciding I would just vote, and relax, and hang out with some friends and watch
the results on TV. And it was a good use of time, and served the gospel by
helping us rest and recuperate.
But
here's the challenge in making these choices: whatever we choose, if we've made
our choice in order to serve the gospel, we have to make sure that we actually
use that choice to serve the gospel.
If you
chose to babysit your grandchild instead of volunteering at church because you
think it will serve the gospel better for you to be a godly Christian influence
in the life of your grandchild, then you need to make sure you are actually
being a godly Christian influence in their life for your service to be
effective! If you chose the higher paying job because you feel you can serve
the gospel better by having more money to give to mission work, then you need
to actually give the money to mission work for that service to be effective! If
you choose to get married instead of staying single, then you need to actually
invest in your marriage as part of furthering the gospel for that service to be
effective! If you choose to pray for something, then set aside a time where you
can concentrate and reflect and pray thoughtfully and effectively! And when you
choose to get involved in actual front-facing gospel ministries like teaching
scripture, running youth group, attending a Bible study, then you have to work
to be effective in those ministries - that means building relationships of
trust and support and encouragement, learning what is being taught and teaching
it effectively through what you say and how you live!
So what
decisions are you in the process of making right now, this week, this month?
What big and small decisions are coming up for you? I urge you this week as you
make those decisions to factor into your decisionmaking how your choice is
going to help you serve the gospel. Then I urge you to take that factor and put
it at the top of your list in your decisionmaking. Let the service to the
gospel rule your decision-making process. If you do, then by all means possible
we might save some people. And alongside Paul, we can all share in the
blessings of the gospel.
Sermon: The Ascension Foreshadowed (Psalm 68:15-35; Ephesians 4:7-13)
When we left Namibia in 2020, we left in a hurry: three days’ notice, one suitcase each, no farewells. It was the opposite of a Band-Aid: despite the fact we were removed quickly, it was more painful.
We've
just gotten back from three weeks in Namibia, going to collect
some things, but mainly to say goodbye to all those friends we never got the
chance with before. And at first, everyone was so glad to see us again! We
could eat together, tell our stories, catch up on what has happened in our
absence. But all too soon it became three weeks of goodbyes. Three weeks of
"When will you be back?" Three weeks of "Can you stay just one
more day with us?" Three weeks of "I don't want you to go."
Leaving was hard, but at least this time we knew it's the right thing to do.
Penny has her PhD; I have my ministry with Horizons. Those things can't happen
till we're back in Australia.
Last
week, Christians around the world remembered Jesus' death on Good Friday, and
together we also celebrated his resurrection on Easter Sunday. But there's
another important holiday which comes 40 days after Easter, and commemorates
another important event in Christ's story. 40 days after his resurrection,
Jesus ascended into heaven. Ascension Day is a public holiday in Namibia; here
we get no such luck.
Just
imagine for a moment being one of the apostles on that day. Just over a month
before, you witnessed Jesus killed on a cross, and you thought that everything
was over: the person you thought was the messiah had been executed as a criminal,
and while you mourned all the people around you rejoiced. But then, three days
later, Jesus rose from the dead, and you had him back! He was with you again,
walking and talking and teaching and being wonderful. "This is it!"
you think. "Now that Jesus is risen, he will surely conquer our enemies,
those enemies that crucified him. He will ascend to the throne of Israel, and
restore the kingdom to its glory!" This is what you would have thought,
because we're told in Acts chapter 1 that this is exactly what the disciples
were thinking: verse 6, "Then they gathered around him and asked him,
“Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?”
You see,
even after Christ's shocking death and amazing resurrection, the apostles were
still expecting a victorious ruler over Israel. Their minds were likely cast
back to pictures of God's ascension in the Old Testament, pictures like we see
in Psalm 68, which we've just heard read to us. In such pictures, Israel gets
special pride of place.
Our reading
in Psalm 68 starts off talking about Mount Bashan - a big, tall mountain with
snowy peaks that reach up into the heavens, a place known for warriors and
creatures of great might. The bulls of Bashan are referred to elsewhere in
scripture as symbols of strength. But we're told this great mountain is
envious. Why?
Because
it's a place that seems suited for the throne of a God, but God doesn't choose
it! God chooses instead Mount Zion - not even a mountain really, more of a
hill. It doesn't reach up into the sky. It's pretty unimpressive. But it is in
Jerusalem, the city of God's people, the city of his chosen and beloved king
David. So that is where God chooses to build his temple; that is where God
makes his throne.
This is
the picture the apostles have in their mind about what God's victory is going
to look like: it involves God's messiah ascending to Mount Zion like a king who
has been victorious in battle. He leads the people he defeated in battle as
captives; there is a huge celebration with music and sacrifices to God; his
people bring him many gifts to welcome their God, and even the kings of
foreign nations, who have for so long been enemies on the doorstep of the
kingdom, are humbled and must bring tribute to God as their rightful ruler; and
those who continue to stand against him will be violently crushed - his
chosen people will wade in the blood of God's defeated enemies.
That's
how the apostles were feeling on Ascension Day. To this point they had not seen
much evidence of this sort of thing happening. In fact, they'd seen the
opposite: Jesus seems to constantly be getting humbled! Born in a manger,
living on the edge of rural Judea as a carpenter, wandering from place to place
with nowhere to sleep, supported by women because he has no money, dining with
sinners, touching the sick and demon possessed, rejected by the Jewish leaders
and the people, arrested and convicted as a criminal, killed on a cross like a
thief.
But now
he's resurrected. Now things are going to change! Now we'll see psalm 68
fulfilled! Now it's time to party, right? Right, Jesus?
But
Jesus' response to the apostles is confusing. He said to them: “It is not for
you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority. But you
will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my
witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the
earth.”
And then
in verse 9, something completely unexpected happens: "After he said this,
he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their
sight." Rather than ascending to a throne in Jerusalem, Jesus ascended
into heaven, leaving the disciples without him once again!
How
do you think it felt? Jesus had come back from the dead
victorious over the grave, you got to hang out with him for a month, and then
he just left again? And not just left, but floated up into heaven never to be
seen again? Would you be shocked?
They were
shocked. The apostles were so shocked that Acts says they just stood
there staring into the sky until a couple of angels came and told them to stop
standing around gawping.
Have you
ever felt the loss of Jesus to humanity? Have you ever wished that you could
just head to Jerusalem and meet him face to face? Maybe you'd like to ask him
some tough theological question, or to listen to him preach. Maybe you'd drag
your friends and family there and say "See? I told you he exists!"
Maybe you'd go to him and ask him to stop your enemies oppressing you. Maybe
you'd bring him gifts because you love him so much; or go to celebrate his
greatness with music and dancing and food and festivals. Maybe you'd take
your kids to be blessed by him. Maybe you'd go just to touch the edge of
his robe and be healed, or to ask him for some food.
Wouldn't
that be awesome? That's what we lost when Jesus ascended back to heaven.
We lost psalm 68. We lost that opportunity for witness and celebration and
justice and worship and healing and answers and and and.
But we
didn't. This is what Paul clarifies for us when he talks about Christ's
ascension in Ephesians chapter 4. He wants to show us another side of the
ascension; a different impact, how it affects us in ways perhaps we hadn't
considered. Rather than us feeling like we have lost something, he wants us to
hear psalm 68 in a different way, to view its importance differently to the
narrative of God ascending to his temple, or a king to his earthly throne, so
we can see what we've actually gained from Christ's ascension into
heaven. Paul quotes just one verse from psalm 68, but it's enough to
remind us of the whole psalm, to evoke all these pictures, all these
thoughts that people were having and that we still have, so that he can give us
a new perspective on those pictures.
When Paul
starts talking about the ascension to the Ephesians, the first point he wants
to make is in verses 9 and 10. Let's start with verse 9: "(What does “he
ascended” mean except that he also descended to the lower, earthly
regions?
When we
read ascension psalms like psalm 68, to us it sounds like God is being lifted
up, made more worthy, more glorified, becoming somehow greater than he already
was, like he's attaining something he didn't already have. But Paul is
reminding us that in psalm 68, God is "ascending" to a mountain that
isn't even the biggest mountain in the area.
Psalm
68:33 describes God as "him who rides across the highest heavens." In
order to ascend to mount Zion, which direction must God travel from
the highest heavens? Downwards! In order to take his throne in the temple
among his people, God must first descend to them.
And so it
is with Jesus. Christ's ascension reminds us firstly that he is immanuel - God
with us. Jesus came and lived among us as one of us. And that is certainly
something we can celebrate, just as Israel celebrated God making his place in
Jerusalem.
But we
shouldn't be surprised that he would return to the heavens from which he came,
just like our friends in Namibia weren't surprised that we would one day
return to Australia. It is glorifying for Jesus to ascend to heaven once again.
That is where his throne is. His ascension is one of those clear proofs to us
that Jesus really is God, and not just a prophet or a miracle worker.
So when
we now read verse 10, "He who descended is the very one who ascended
higher than all the heavens, in order to fill the whole universe.)" we see
that his ascension not only reminds us that Jesus truly is God, but also
that it's his ascension that allows him to fill the whole universe - to live in
the heart of every Christian in the world, to be with us all in a way that he
simply couldn't be if he were enthroned in Jerusalem.
Skip
ahead to the end of Ephesians 4:13 - the goal is that "we all reach unity
in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature,
attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ."
We don't
have a God who is distant from us, like a king who we can see maybe once
in our lives from a distance who hands down pronouncements but who has a
tight inner circle we are not a part of. No, God's plan is that all of us, all
Christians united, know Jesus more and more, till Christ fills us to the
brim.
It's this
idea of Christ filling us that I want to explore in more detail, and is the
focus of Paul's use of psalm 68. In Eph 4:8, Paul quotes verse 18 of the
psalm: 'This is why it says: “When he ascended on high, he took many captives
and gave gifts to his people.”'
"But
wait," the eagle-eyed among you will be saying at this point, "Didn't
verse 18 of Psalm 68 say, "When you ascended on high, you took many
captives; you received gifts from people"? What's going on here? Paul
seems to have changed the Psalm. For one, he's changed the person from
referring to God in the second person "When you, you took, you received"
to the third person "When he, he took, his people". That's not such a
big deal though. But the more troubling change is that where the psalm says
"you received gifts from people", Paul writes "gave gifts to his
people". Giving and receiving are the opposite! What’s going on here?
I looked
at what some different scholars said, and to me, it seems that Paul has made a
decision to adapt the wording of his quote to fit the context of his message to
the Ephesians and explain the reality of Christ's ascension with the
picture from psalm 68. This is something we do when we read or preach from the
Bible even today: sometimes we come across a passage where its immediate
application to the lives of its hearers is one we would never do in the modern
world and in the light of Jesus.
A classic
example is our sermon series last year on Leviticus. We looked at verses that
told us how to ritually bathe, avoid unclean foods, even how to buy slaves. But
in none of those cases did we ever apply the lesson directly from Leviticus. Reading
them in the light of Jesus, we actually end up doing the opposite! We preachers
didn't change the words of Leviticus to fit our message, but we certainly
updated the application for 21st century Christians.
I think Paul
is doing the same thing, but by adjusting the words of the psalm itself to make
the point. This was an understood and acceptable practice at the time, and
makes a lot more sense when you have a biblically literate audience who know
the passage so well that they can appreciate the purpose of the change without
feeling it threatens the reliability or inspiration of scripture.
So now
that we understand what's going on, what is Paul saying about the impact of
Christ's ascension on our relationship with him by using psalm 68?
Well, it
starts at Ephesians 4:7 "But to each one of us grace has been given as
Christ apportioned it."
First of
all, Paul makes clear that God is in the business of
giving people grace. He uses the word "apportioned" which
might make it sound like he's being stingy, like there's only so much grace
going around and we are lucky to get just enough to get by. But we know that's
not true. God is overflowing with overabundant grace. Yes, some people need to
be forgiven much - and God forgives them much! This grace of God is a big theme
for Paul in Ephesians. And the psalm describes God as “God our Savior, who
daily bears our burdens", "a God who saves; from him comes
"escape from death".
But Paul
doesn't just talk about the saving grace that God has given us; he also talks
about the grace that God gives us in providing good works for us to do in his
name. He talks about God's grace in making Paul a servant of the gospel, and
God's grace in giving Paul the job of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles.
Directly after saying in Ephesians 2:8 "For it is by grace you have been
saved, through faith —and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—
not by works, so that no one can boast" he immediately follows in verse 10
with "For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good
works"! In Paul's mind, God's grace - his undeserved favour to
us - is not only seen in the fact that he saves us, but also in
the fact that he allows us to participate in his work of showing grace to all
people. This is why grace is “apportioned” – because even though we all
get this grace of doing good works, not all of us do the same works. We’re
given different jobs, different portions.
So when
Paul then quotes psalm 68 and evokes the picture of the victorious
king taking many captives and giving gifts to his people, we see how
he is using this to describe what is happening at Christ's ascension. Who is it
that Christ takes captive? Us! Some of the language that the psalm uses to talk
about God's enemies is quite confronting, but all the more so when you realise
that we all were God's enemies before we were saved.
What are
the gifts that God is giving to his people? According to Paul in Ephesians 4:11
"So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the
pastors and teachers, to equip his people for works of service".
Not only
is God's grace shown to us in the gifts he equips us with and the works he
provides for us to do... but we ourselves are actually the gift to one another,
to equip each other to do the good works!
The
original verse in the psalm talks about gifts coming to God "even from the
rebellious", referring to how God is worthy of praise and honour even from
those who stand against him - another picture of God's victory. But now with
Paul's focus it becomes "gave gifts to his people, even from the
rebellious". That's us: enemies of God now captured by his love
and transformed into gifts for one another.
When we
as Christians are united in seeking to grow into the fullness of Christ, we are
all both the recipient of God's grace, and the giver of it, and the
actual gift! How much more involved in God's plan could we be? When Jesus
ascended into heaven, he started a work of filling the whole universe with
himself, and made us a part of that. That's what the ascension means for us.
Now I
don't want to talk too much about spiritual gifts in detail, because next week
we'll be looking at the foreshadowing of Pentecost. So instead let me leave you
with this question: do you feel like you're a gift to God's people, given to
help unite us in being filled with Jesus? Because that's what you are. You are
a gift to me, just as I am to you, and we are all gifts to
one another.
These
last few weeks, Penny and I have been inundated with stories from our friends
in Namibia about how we've been a gift from God to them, and not just in
Penny's lecturing or our preaching. It was how we were role models of
being married; of being friends and work colleagues who were there when they
needed help or advice or just a listening ear; it was giving loans, offering
lifts, hospital visits, sharing life, sharpening one another. And that
means everyone who helped financially support us or who prayed for us to get
there was also a gift to those people.
We don't
often go around talking to each other another about how big an impact we
are in each other's Christian life. It's easy when you have an upfront role
like preaching to see how you're a gift. Sometimes it's more difficult to see
how you might be a gift to others. But it's easier to focus on how other Christians
are a gift from God that helps you mature in Christ. Every person who has
inspired you in your Christian life; who helped you navigate a difficult time;
who had been a spiritual role model; who has served you as part of the
body of Christ - they were gifts to you. And in those same ways, you are a gift
to others.
So next
time you think about how you wish that Jesus was here, instead of staring up
into the sky waiting for him to come back, remember you’re part of his
ascension, and think about how you are contributing to filling up someone else
with Christ.